The products listed below represent our selection of new antibodies for 2007. For convenience they are presented here in one list under categories of potential, but not exclusive, use. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bovine Anti-Goat IgG (H+L) Bovine serum albumin (BSA) and dry milk are used extensively for blocking non-specific binding of antibodies and for stabilizing antibodies and other proteins during freeze drying and in dilute solutions. However, dry milk and most commercial sources of BSA contain bovine IgG which interferes with the use of any anti-goat IgG (as well as anti-sheep IgG) secondary antibodies. When BSA or dry milk are used for blocking, any bovine IgG which binds to a tissue or substrate surface will be labeled by anti-goat IgG. This background labeling may lead to false interpretations or needless repetition of experiments. Similarly, BSA and dry milk in antibody diluents may form immune complexes between the bovine IgG and anti-goat IgG, thus lowering antibody titer and creating backgound from unbound bovine IgG remaining in the diluent. Also, bovine IgG bound to cells after they are cultured in media containing fetal calf serum may result in background labeling on cell surfaces and on Western blots of cell lysate proteins. The reason for this problem is the close phylogenetic relationship between cows and goats. Anti-goat IgG reacts so completely with bovine IgG that it is economically unfeasible to create by solid phase adsorption an anti-goat IgG which does not cross-react with bovine IgG. Our new bovine anti-goat IgG (H+L) was created by immunizing a cow host with goat IgG. By recognizing only non-self epitopes on goat IgG, the cow host was able to produce anti-goat IgG which inherently had minimal reactivity for bovine IgG. Blocking with 5% normal serum from the host species of the secondary antibody, instead of BSA or dry milk, is still recommended as the most efficient block. However, our new bovine anti-goat IgG (H+L) antibodies listed in the table below will be useful for all applications in which goat primary antibodies must be selectively labeled in the presence of bovine IgG. The antibody also has been extensively adsorbed to minimize cross-reaction with many other species for multiple labeling experiments, and to reduce background labeling of tissue associated immunoglobulins in those species.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Anti-IgG, Light Chain Specific for Western Blotting (02-12-07) Following last year's introduction of our new Anti-Rabbit IgG, Light Chain Specific antibodies for Western blotting, we are now offering in addition Anti-Mouse IgG, and Anti-Rat IgG, Light Chain Specific antibodies for Western blotting. Anti-IgG, Light Chain Specific antibodies react strongly with native primary antibodies used for detecting specific protein bands on Western blots. Anti-light chain specific antibodies, however, do not bind to the reduced and denatured IgG heavy chain band (50 kD) on blots (Figures A, C, and D). Therefore, by using our new anti-light chain specific antibodies, detection of antigens with molecular weights near 50 kD is not obscured by large amounts of reduced and denatured IgG heavy chains from primary antibodies used for immunoprecipitation (IP) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figures A-D. Heavy (50 kD) and light (25 kD) chains of reduced and SDS-denatured mouse IgG ((A-B), rat IgG (C), and rabbit IgG (D) were separated by SDS-PAGE (lanes with red numbers) and detectedon Western blots using HRP-goat anti-mouse IgG, Light Chain specific (A), HRP-goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L)(B), HRP-Goat anti-rat IgG, Light Chain specific (C), and HRP-mouse anti-rabbit IgG, Light Chain specific (D). No heavy chain band was detected even on lanes heavily overloaded with IgG when anti-IgG, Light Chain specific antibodies were used ( A, C, and D) for detection. However, both heavy and light chain bands were detected with anti-IgG (H+L)(B). Lanes with blue numbers contained reduced and SDS-denatured goat IgG (A, B, and C) or mouse IgG (D), which served as background controls. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Although the new antibodies react strongly with native IgG light chains, they do not react as strongly with the reduced and denatured light chains on blots. Therefore, they are not recommended for sensitive or quantitative detection of reduced and denatured light chains on Western blots. The antibodies have been thoroughly adsorbed to minimize cross-reactivity with immunoglobulins from many other species, which also may be present on blots. If the protein of interest has a reduced and denatured molecular weight near 25 kD, anti-IgG, Fc fragment specific antibodies may be used to detect native IgG primary antibodies without binding to the 25 kD band of reduced and denatured IgG light chains on Western blots. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * The antibody reacts primarily with kappa light chains. It is not suitable for sensitive detection of primary antibodies with lambda light chains. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||